Bark Beetle (Scolytinae) Gallery

2006-11-11: Mono comments

To defuse the situ­ation a bit: Mono Mono is a good piece of soft­ware which I like and use quite often. The catch is that I don’t think Mono’s stable yet. Some parts of mono are, oth­ers are not. As the term ‘Mono’ is nor­mally asso­ci­ated with the whole suite (com­piler, lib­rary, tools) this is, from my point of view, acceptable.

Dis­sen­sion on imple­ment­a­tion details is per­mit­ted (even for open source soft­ware), I think.

  • Identi.ca

Bookmarks

Meta

This entry was posted on Saturday, 11 November 2006 at 12:11 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Mono”

  1. Robert Jordan Says:
    November 11th, 2006 at 13:24

    Object­ive cri­ti­cisms are always wel­come. Rants like ‘mcs sup­ports emacs’ ergo ‘the frame­work will never improve’ are not.

    On your pre­vi­ous blog:
    When it come to sup­port­ing ‘leg­acy’ frame­works like emacs, cod­ing
    style doesn’t mat­ter. What mat­ters is that 1000s of developers don’t
    have to change their emacs con­fig nor do they have to wait for
    an emacs fix, which can take years to spread.

  2. phbaer Says:
    November 11th, 2006 at 13:53

    … no comment.

  3. JFromm Says:
    November 11th, 2006 at 21:28

    The link to the mono pro­ject site in the ori­ginal post is wrong. The cor­rect link is http://www.mono-project.com

  4. hhmmmm » Freie Angebote Says:
    June 4th, 2008 at 21:19

    […] Erfahrung: Pro­jekte, die ihre Dien­ste kos­ten­los zur Ver­fü­gung stel­len, soll­ten auch nicht nur im Ansatz krit­is­iert wer­den, bzw. man sollte sich auch nicht trauen, ein­fach mal zu fra­gen. Ein kleiner Aus­schnitt aus […]

Leave a Reply